untitled
viviti
If there are images in this attachment, they will not be displayed.  Download the original attachment
Page 1
OUT
ONLY
IN
A Short Fiction
By
David A. Archer
02/15/1968
Copyright©6/26/2006

Page 2
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
2
I figured it out, you know. Some time ago I think, but only
happened on the opportunity to explore it in a real sense,
recently. This, even after some years of trying to no avail as a
child, then some years of no longer even giving it a thought.
As I strolled along some time ago now, perhaps a year as it
is seen, it finally dawned on me as to why- when a child - I
never quite managed to dig my way “clean through to China”
in the many endeavors of such activities I began….but
obviously never finished.
It just isn’t possible! And those that still claim it is, simply
haven’t made certain and very basic realizations that I seem to
have, and will seek to divulge here in.
You see, I’ve even discovered why it just isn’t possible.
No, it isn’t because it is too far. It isn’t because there is
supposedly some blob of molten stuff between the two
prospective points, somewhere in the middle. It isn’t because
there aren’t any shovels or other instruments big enough to do
the job or children (and other types of people) willing to try.
Quite simply put, it is very much because the “middle” isn’t
where everyone seems to think it is.
I walked along some time ago as this finally came to mind
in crystal clear sense, and then began the chore of seeking out
some particulars for myself. This just in the effort to better
seat the radical change I had discovered, within my own
understanding.
Without challenging you to understand all of the
complicated scientific like stuff that I have waded through in
this task, I will again only state the obvious; “Out” is really
only “In” so to speak.
As it is in modern understanding, many now believe that our
“planet” revolves around a center point we call the “sun”….
and beyond that are many vast spaces and configurations of
other articles in motion, which comprise what we call our
“universe.”
This is a great fallacy and a really mean trick to play on all
of the kids in the world still trying to dig their way to China.

Page 3
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
3
I count myself no longer a fool in those numbers of people
still not knowing that they were actually digging away from
anything we as humans even can imagine…. Especially away
from that which we have examined and viewed.
Quite factually, I have discovered that China isn’t “under”
us, or “through the planet” on the other side of us. It is very
much only kind of across from us so to speak. “Across” a not
so vast expanse of area which most of us know as “space.”
You see…. “up,” that is to say, “Out” as we see it, is really
only “in.” And it is only “in” until you are half way “across.”
Then it becomes “down” again.
I have discovered some things that I really feel would be
more trouble than it would be worth to bring to light within the
scientific communities, mostly because I do not want to deal
with small minded arguments and egocentric posturing simply
for the recognition, so I do hope that you will keep this all to
yourself to some degree.
Firstly I should explain that our complicated explanations
for and of “gravity” are really just mumbo jumbo invented to
make some people look important. It is very much as it seems
topically as can be demonstrated in spinning any common item
that can be spun to demonstrate such. For instance, if you use
a regular old balloon… you blow it up and then look at it. You
can then easily see what it is that I am talking about.
Our planet isn’t round… at least not in the way that we all
think. It doesn’t travel around a central point in what we think
is space. And, sadly enough as it were, it isn’t the center of the
universe as was once thought, either.
It is round in a way like the balloon you could be looking at
right now…. And even round like any other inflatable sports
ball. The difference being is understanding and perspective
pertaining to the configuration of the “round” part and how
exactly it actually figures into the bigger picture, as it were.
If you are looking at a balloon or sports ball, simply stop
imagining that if it were a “planet,” that we somehow manage
to keep ourselves stuck to the outside of it while it spins.
Simply make the realization that we exist, as does all else
within our knowledge, on the inside of the balloon or sports
ball.

Page 4
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
4
Yes, the “Earth” is round, but not in the “walking on the
outside of it way.” It is round in the “walking on the inside of
it way.”
Everything else that we know of as “space” and the like, is
simply incredibly small, and it is limited in distance though far
enough that we can’t see to the other side of the expanse
between where you are and the other side of the “planet.”
You may immediately ask many of what you think are
sound physical and pertinent questions, one of which being that
such would not be possible because things like the sun and
moon are always the same size and move through the sky.
How could they do so while being contained within… up, as it
were, from us, in a contained area?
Well that is an easy one….. would be my response. The
answer is simple. They don’t move in any way, and neither
does anything else in “space” with such relations. Sure, there’s
some stuff still bouncing around in there, but that is not of
much import really. It is just important to know that none of
what we think are large planets and stuff…. Aren’t really that
big and they aren’t moving.
They are quite small…. Some even microscopic in fact, and
the round thing that we walk on the inside of, is the reason they
all look like they move when we look “up,” or “in” rather, at
them.
I found this out while doing an experiment with a helium
balloon which I attached a message to. I did this experiment
after I started to realize the actual configuration of the space
things and stuff.
I let the balloon fly “up” and toward and through what I
hoped would be its path to the other side of the inside part of
the round thing that we walk on the inside part of.
To make a long story short, I was correct in most everything
I had realized about the mean joke played on kids thinking they
are going to dig to China. The helium balloon went all of the
way in and through to the other side.
What I found really interesting about this, was that I found
there is a compression value in such “space travel.” That is the

Page 5
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
5
reason, though I’m no scientist, that I believe all of the other
space type of things “out” there are so small. It is actually
“in.” It is “in” in ways that are more than just “inward” in
direction pertaining to “in.” Then of course, it is “out” in just
as many ways pertaining to “out,” but only so far until you
again find yourself on the “walking on the inside part of the
round thing”…. Which as you know is called the ground.
I found further proof of these findings beyond the helium
balloon experiment when I borrowed a really powerful
telescope and began to snoop around some on my own.
The first thing I noticed was that the small things in the sky
we call stars, are really pretty small and only look bigger in a
telescope because no one ever looks at them next to anything
they can compare them to.
I decided I was going to be the guy that did that. The guy
that made the effort to look at them next to something else. So
I did.
One night, on a very clear night and at a place I will not
disclose. I set up the telescope and began my experiments.
I looked through the telescope and situated it on a “star.”
I then produced a very long stick with a glow in the dark
antenna ball on the end of it, and placed it out in front of the
telescope directly next to the supposedly distant star.
I found that I was correct when I extended the glow in the
dark antenna ball. It appeared to be the very same size that it
had before I extended the long stick, but now it was very near
the same “distance” as was the “star.”
I know this because I looked in a book and then measured
the stick to be the same length as was the published distance of
the star, supposedly “away” from “Earth.” The fact is,
measurement changes…more that it converts “shrinki-ness”
and “distance” when in reference to “outer space” and then is
documented as a given “distance.”
The “length” of measure isn’t necessarily the actual
“distance” to the very small physical object that we see, being a
“star” for instance. BUT, the measurement given compensates
with the shrinking effect from here to there… so as the stick

Page 6
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
6
shrinks, it will shrink just right to be equal to the place where
the very small “star” is.
In this finding I was especially pleased and further was glad
that I had come prepared to find what I had suspected to be a
truth. I then replaced the glow in the dark antenna ball with
several large marshmallows, and commenced to enjoy several
helpings of star roasted smores and crispy burnt marshmallows.
The trick is in rotating the marshmallow so as to evenly brown
it…especially when using a “distant” star because they are so
small. It takes longer than next to a roaring campfire or even
your stove. So just keep that in mind before you go trying it
yourself.
I did another balloon experiment, but this time I watched it
all the way through as far as I could, and again witnessed more
which substantiated my discoveries thus far. It actually had to
begin to “squish” through at one point. It, itself had to begin to
get smaller as it squished and made that annoying squeaky
balloon sound, then re-emerging within view as it began its
“descent.”
Further in my investigations, I found myself enthralled with
the idea of things such as the “North Pole” and then of course
the “South Pole.”
“How could they fit in with all of these new realizations?” I
thought to myself quite a bit.
I then made it a point to investigate and found that they are
actually connected, but because of that compression aspect, I
couldn’t personally make the journey all of the way through at
first, but then I devised a contraption which I actually fitted to
the “pole.”
This contraption acted to stabilize the atmospheric pressure
while it “climbed” the pole in one direction and then descended
in the other. Both in a very controlled and smooth fashion.
I call it the People, Space Pole Slider Thing and must admit
that it has thus far performed rather efficiently. It is an aspect I
would greatly appreciate some level of secrecy about so as to
avoid heavy corporate combat with established amusement
park companies. I can just see where they would love to
exploit such for their own personal gain, and to tell you the
truth, I don’t have the legal team with which to fend off such

Page 7
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
7
bullies…. And further I can see where allowing such a
conversion to amusement park status, might be an ethical
violation of universal proportions. Besides, before you knew it
people would be lined up half way around the inside of the
“walking on part of the round thing” we think is a “planet,” just
to squirt over to the other side of the pole.
The more I think back on it, the more I am glad that I
stopped digging for China when I did. Really, we can’t begin
to imagine what would have happened if I managed to actually
break through the shell of the outside part of the round thing
we exist within. I might have got sucked out into something
that might as well be anyone’s guess.
Further, I am now finding some harbored feelings toward
my parents that I never knew existed before I made these
realizations.
Let’s be factual about this.
What were they thinking in not only letting me try to dig my
way to China, and thusly endangering me with the remote
chance that I would be sucked out into something no one
knows about, but even encouraging it?
Maybe I could file some sort of reckless endangerment suit?
Maybe even some sort of emotional abuse type of thing within
the knowledge of what I have recently discovered about their
level of negligence? Malice, even?
It goes even beyond negligence!
They actually encouraged me in my childhood endeavors!
What this means in the light of these new findings which I have
discovered personally, is that they might have very well wanted
me to dig so far that I would at least not come back, if it is that
I managed not to get sucked out into whatever it is that is
actually on the outside part of the inside part of where we exist.
You have to admit, that is just plain mean. Then, they never
let me in on the fact that it isn’t possible for a child to dig all of
the way to China.
I had to figure it out for myself some years after it was no
longer of any interest, anyway.

Page 8
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
8
I am so glad that I finally just lost interest in such play time
activity.
Man! Think about that! My play time activities were
actually partially designed for the possibility of my getting
ejected off of the outside part of whatever is the outside part of
the spinning round thing we all live in. It kind of makes me
want to build a safe room or something, just for a sense of
security to help me through those moments when thoughts
about such designs make me feel far too alone and fragile.
How is it that society can be so reckless with its children?
How is it that society can allow such malicious intent as in
arming a child with a shovel and actually encouraging such
dangerous activity?
As an adult, I personally don’t like even the remote chance
that some anonymous child somewhere might just compromise
the safety of our atmosphere. Even though it is somewhat
polluted and dangerous of itself these days.
The fact is, even that polluted atmosphere could be
jeopardized in such a breach.
What if everything else got sucked out, too?
Is that risk worth the wicked little pleasurable thoughts
going through a parents mind as they stand in the kitchen
watching from a distance and quietly chanting; “DIG DIG DIG
DIG?” Pumping their fists slowly and hoping secretly behind
their caring façade that a huge puff of dust will rise, and a huge
sucking sound will fill the general vicinity?
After making these discoveries, I really don’t think such
risk is worth those small, yet probably delectable pleasures.
This even in the face of not yet a parent.
I do admit that such risks might be tempting, simply in a
sort of “turnabout” manner. And particularly given the near
tonnage of dirt I moved for no reason as a child.
I recant that. Being that I had a pretty good reason, it was
simply a reason which was not entirely what I thought it was.

Page 9
OUT ONLY IN
A SHORT FICTION BY- David A. Archer
9
So in that it is that I will surmise this initial effort to
disclose some of my recent findings in offering some quaint
and uncomplicated advice;
If it’s China that you are aiming to get to?
You’re better off on the slow boat by any means.
That is even and especially if you plan on digging your way
there regardless of what you, your parents or even your very
best friend seem to think momentarily.
Of course, you could always squeak through in a large
helium balloon I suppose. As long as you don’t mind talking
in that incredibly annoying voice pitch when you get there.

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com